It does have a PCI slot, but it requires a riser board which appears impossible to find, so this leads me to my next simple question.Īre USB to LAN adapters any good? It's a firewall, so gigabit is not essential. It would be a little beastie for pfSense, however! It only has one LAN port. I want <50W, <30 would be amazing.įinally, I actually have an x86-based thin client, it has a 1GHz VIA Luke CPU, 512MB (up to 1GB) of RAM and a 40GB hard drive, and it consumes about 30W. I have one sitting in the corner of my room, and it sits in the corner because it pulls 130W when sitting on the BIOS screen.

What I'm curious about hardware-wise is what could be considered the cheapest hardware to reliably run pfSense on? And this hardware must be power efficient, it can not be some old P4 Optiplex piece of shit. ĮDIT2: Seems they edited that, the APU1d won't be compatible.I've been curious about pfSense for a long time, it seems incredibly flexible and looks like it could do just about anything you want, but I've never had the hardware to try it out. So as of right now, I would also be extremely hesitant to purchase the Netgate SG-2220 without some sort of assurance that the router I got is not affected by it.ĮDIT: Interestingly enough, someone from Netgate said that the PC Engines APU is unaffected. In addition, the Netgate SG-2220 uses an Atom C2338, which was susceptible to the LPC bus failure. I use pfsense as a home router, and while I am very happy with it, I will be forced to upgrade that hardware, and I do not use any feature sets that require the use of AES-NI. It has the AMD G series T40E, which is based off of the Bobcat architecture ). The immediate predecessor to the Netgate SG-2220 ( I forget the Model, but it was based off of the the PC Engines apu1d ) does not support AES-NI.

Cheapest pfsense box